This business is Trusted — customers consistently rate it 4.7★ across 1,084 reviews, indicating reliable, quality service.
Strong long-term review history with 1,084 reviews and a 4.7★ average signals reliable, consistent service.
Monday: Open 24 hours
Tuesday: Open 24 hours
Wednesday: Open 24 hours
Thursday: Open 24 hours
Friday: Open 24 hours
Saturday: Open 24 hours
Sunday: Open 24 hours
Clients consistently cite professional communication, timely responses, and clear counsel.
Complex cases may involve longer timelines — set realistic expectations early.
Clients who need professional legal counsel with clear, direct communication.
Review Rank Score (0–100) blends a Bayesian-adjusted rating, review volume, recent sentiment, and rating consistency. It's a predictive reputation estimate — not a replica of Google or Yelp's ranking.
My atterney passed away and I needed a new attorney to take a case that is current in appeal with Appeals Cousil. He did not represent my case well, as he had cognitive problems due to his illness prior to hearing and during the hearing. I had to explain the issue over and over again to an intake person that seemed to be subcontracted from another country. She was professional and sympathetic throughout the conversation, but lacked understanding on how appeal to Appeal Counsil work with SSDI - that even if you claim is denied you can still appeal twice. Then she got in touch with a local firm to review and they informed me to follow up with SSI on questions. After 3 unsuccessful texting attemps, I still did not get text message with questions. I asked for questions to be emailed, but was told that they can not email. I asked what are the questions, and they were the exact same questions that I already answered. I was then informed that they can not take my case because it was already denied and in appeal. After 45 minutes of complete intake, they told me something that took another attorney office paralegal to do within 5 minutes by phone "We do not take cases lost by other attorneys or wait until you get a reply from SSDI". Seems like a waste of company's time and my time. If you are in my scenario, consider that this is the answer you will get and save yourself 45min. What puzzles me that many "respected" "for over 20+ years of experience" attorneys refuse to take cases initially lost by other attorneys on a first attempt due to technicality, but yet, when you read reviewes that their clients leave for them, it states all over that they too had to go through denials and appeals. I do not enjoy leaving poor reveiws online, but I have no access to the upper managment of this firm to bring it to their attention. They girl was very nice, but they should train their emoployees better and assure goog communication via text messaging and emails.
See why this business ranks here and how customers describe it. Get a breakdown of your Smart Score and what it would take to reach the next trust tier.
Get Ranking Report — $19Reports do not affect rankings.
Data sourced from Google Places API · ReviewRank Smart Score
Rankings are based on public review signals only. No paid placements.
Vicki helped me in ways I never thought. No games just a serious conversation. God speed and bless M&M. Charlie was exceptional as well. Helped me route applying through them if you will. These people are so HUMAN, Amen!
The team can be really hard to get a hold of. I feel I’ve done most of the heavy lifting. After leaving a review that wasn’t so favorable, I got better service. The case isn’t over yet and if I am actually feeling prepared before my hearing because of the work MORGAN AND MORGAN put into this, I’ll be more than happy to change this again!
DECLINED REPRESENTATION WITHOUT REASON OR REFERRAL I reached out to this firm regarding a serious legal matter, only to be rejected without a single word of explanation. Despite their marketing as a firm that fights for the people, they flatly refused to provide any reason for their decision. When I asked for a recommendation or next steps, I was simply told to go "google it." They offered zero professional courtesy and no referral to another attorney or legal aid. Leaving a homeless individual with PTSD in the dark during a financial crisis is neither professional nor humane. DISORGANIZED INTAKE AND INTERNAL HANDOFFS The intake process was a disorganized waste of time. I was repeatedly called from a California number by an office that failed to identify itself. I was shuffled between various assistants and placed on hold multiple times, only to be transferred to a legal assistant who provided no answers. It felt like a factory line where nobody was actually listening to the facts of a case involving stolen state-mandated disability benefits. COMMUNICATION PREFERENCES IGNORED I explicitly requested that all correspondence be handled via email to maintain a written record. Instead, this firm completely ignored my boundaries and called me incessantly, day after day. All of the back-and-forth and the final rejection should have been handled via a single email. For a firm of this size, the failure to follow simple communication instructions is unacceptable. CASE SUMMARY: WITHHOLDING OF ABD BENEFITS Issue: Theft/Withholding of DSHS Aged, Blind, and Disabled (ABD) Financial Assistance. Amount: $200 of $450 (44%) withheld since December 1st, 2026. Location: Wenatchee, WA (Card purchased at Walmart). Context: Currently homeless with PTSD, awaiting SSA ALJ Hearing outcome.
nicole was amazing, very patient, she must have gone through some kind of sensitivity training I love her