This business is Trusted — customers consistently rate it 4.9★ across 681 reviews, indicating reliable, quality service.
Strong long-term review history with 681 reviews and a 4.9★ average signals reliable, consistent service.
Monday: Open 24 hours
Tuesday: Open 24 hours
Wednesday: Open 24 hours
Thursday: Open 24 hours
Friday: Open 24 hours
Saturday: Open 24 hours
Sunday: Open 24 hours
Clients consistently cite professional communication, timely responses, and clear counsel.
Complex cases may involve longer timelines — set realistic expectations early.
Clients who need professional legal counsel with clear, direct communication.
Review Rank Score (0–100) blends a Bayesian-adjusted rating, review volume, recent sentiment, and rating consistency. It's a predictive reputation estimate — not a replica of Google or Yelp's ranking.
I had a great experience working with Mike, Julia, and Amber. They were always easy to reach, kept me updated throughout the process, and took the time to answer all of my questions. They made everything stress free, and I really appreciated all of their help. I’d absolutely recommend them to anyone looking for a great legal team!
I was involved in a car accident last year. Was recommended to call Geiger & Bowman. I’m so thankful I did. The attorney I got was Jacob and his team. Jacob and his team have kept in informed on all details about my case. I would recommend this law firm to anyone that needs a good attorney. If I ever need an attorney for anything I will call this law firm.
I had a great experience working with Attorney Jacopo Fabina and his legal assistant, Talena, after a car accident involving my daughter. From the very beginning, they were incredibly responsive, professional, and genuinely caring. They guided me through every step of the process, always taking the time to answer my questions and making sure I understood everything. Their communication was excellent, and I always felt supported and in good hands during a stressful situation. I truly appreciate their dedication and attention to detail. I highly recommend Jacopo Fabina and Talena to anyone in need of reliable and compassionate legal assistance.
See why this business ranks here and how customers describe it. Get a breakdown of your Smart Score and what it would take to reach the next trust tier.
Get Ranking Report — $19Reports do not affect rankings.
Data sourced from Google Places API · ReviewRank Smart Score
Rankings are based on public review signals only. No paid placements.
I had a great experience working with Jacob Fabina and his legal assistant, Talena Burns. They were both professional and highly knowledgeable. Talena responds very quickly to everything and made the entire process smooth and stress-free. They took the time to explain everything clearly and kept me updated throughout. I truly appreciate their support and dedication, and I would highly recommend Jacob and Talena Burns to anyone looking for reliable legal assistance.
I regret hiring GB Law to represent me. In my opinion, this office operates more like a high-volume settlement firm than trial counsel prepared to fully develop and pursue complex cases. Throughout my case, I felt there was a stronger focus on reaching a quick settlement than on building a comprehensive strategy for a claim involving lasting physical and psychological harm. Key issues from my experience: Lack of Proactive Strategy: Important steps, such as obtaining a psychological evaluation, only occurred after I was advised to pursue them by another law firm (Malek & Malek). From my perspective, this was not initially prioritized, which raised concerns for me. Minimizing Relevant Aspects of the Case: When I raised the workers’ compensation component, I was told it was not something the firm would handle and its importance appeared to be downplayed. However, another firm immediately recognized its relevance. Risk-Averse Approach: I felt consistent pressure to accept a lower settlement. Communications focused heavily on the risks of trial, with limited emphasis on advocating for the full value of the claim. To my knowledge, escalation efforts (such as involving a supervisor on the insurance side) were not pursued. Outcome: I ultimately accepted a settlement that I did not believe reflected the full value of my case. This was largely due to my lack of confidence in trial preparation and overall strategy. I also requested a reduction in the contingency fee (from 25% to 20%), given the level of involvement I had in identifying key aspects of my case. That request was declined. Overall, I felt that the level of service did not align with the fees charged. Based on my personal experience, I would carefully evaluate expectations before hiring this firm.